Follow us on:

Groundwater mounding calculator

groundwater mounding calculator , Coupled Groundwater and Surface-water FLOW model based on the USGS Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System (PRMS) and Modular Groundwater Flow Model (MODFLOW-2005) GW_Chart (Windows) Version 1. This mounding effect onto the seasonal high groundwater table is usually obtained via predictive calculations or modeling methods (often called groundwater mounding analysis). Generally, hand calculations or even complex computer model simulations may need to be conducted in order to analyze the potential for groundwater mounding. Because of concerns that subsurface contamination in either soil or groundwater can adversely impact indoor air quality, in 1998, EPA developed a series of models for estimating indoor air concentrations and associated health risks from subsurface vapor intrusion into buildings. Figure 5 is a plot of the initial depth-to-groundwater contour map. As seen on Figures 7 and 8, monitoring well MW-PZ-09D indicated a similar groundwater mound. I looked up the available references and decided to use Mathematica to solve this equation. AWM calculated that a subsurface water mound of approximately 13 feet would occur as a Groundwater treatment is an important remediation effort to ensure groundwater is safe for humans as well as minimizing the impact that contaminants may pose to the environment. Find a particular groundwater monitoring station (well) by entering its identification number, or retrieve a list of stations that satisfy other search criteria. for the purposes of groundwater mounding analysis, where shorter drainage times cause a greater impact. Mound heights calculated by the various methods are compared in Groundwater Effects. S. 43¶ 2. . Nitrate concentrations in the aquifer following infiltration were lowered Groundwater Flow Rate between Up and Downgradient Monitoring Wells (ft/year) 1 36 - 205 2 33 - 201 3 37 - 215 4 50 - 267 2. 54 feet 20 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 120 8. 1 Section through a typical groundwater recharge systcm with infiltration basin and groundwater mound below the basin Fig. Our calculations indicate that the mounded seasonal high water table will bc at least 2 below the RIB. Mounding of groundwater between subsoil drainage pipes is commonly assessed using asimplified steady state solution to Darcy’s Law (for flow of fluid through porous media) assuming that infiltration is constant and evenly distributed and the mound Depth of in-situ soil to high groundwater elevation and bedrock under basal area 6 inches Vertical separation between distribution cell infiltrative surface and seasonal saturation defined by redoximorphic features, groundwater, or bedrock 2 ft measured to the bottom of the ATL system sand. Ensure that ΔH does not put the groundwater mounding level within 5 feet or less of the bottom of the drain field. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT Stormwater infiltration facilities, infiltration rates, full-scale infiltration tests, stormwater infiltration design VIII. The model allows simulation of pumping wells located at grid nodes in a user-specified grid to predict drawdown or mounding from groundwater extraction or injection, respectively. MODELING PROCESS ALL IMPORTANT MECHANISMS & PROCESSES MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE MODEL, OR RESULTS WILL BE INVALID. VIII-5 Figure VIII. A suitable contour interval may be 50 cm. 4. Surface-mount technology (SMT) is a method in which the electrical components are mounted directly onto the surface of a printed circuit board (PCB). 1 to 18. It includes periodic sampling and analysis to detect changes in constituents in groundwater and periodic measurement of water levels to determine the direction of groundwater flow. ___ A sampling and analysis plan. Low Impact Development: Planning and People in a Sustainable Countryside Appendix G – Methods to Evaluate the Consequence of Groundwater Mounding Beneath Infiltration Basins; This appendix describes the calculations needed to estimate the height and lateral spread of a water table mound located beneath a stormwater management feature used for infiltration and the 3 Amendment, Dose, and Delivery Design. This spreadsheet will calculate the height of a groundwater mound beneath a stormwater infiltration basin. The accuracy ofanyprediction ofa groundwater mound height In addition, some facilities must maintain a certain distance between the ground water mound established from the wastewater discharge and the bottom of the discharge unit. For groundwater mounding assessments, Skelly and Loy uses computer models to predict the expected rise in the underlying water table. Allows for Reduction of Stormwater Infrastructure (Piping, Catch-Basins, Retention Ponds, Curbing, etc. Return to Groundwater Mounding Calculator Click here for a benchmark for this calculator. ft. 000 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140---- R = 2. 25-ft ranges from 0 to 100 ft with a median of 10 ft for 432 simulations. . T1 - Estimating Groundwater Mounding in Sloping Aquifers for Managed Aquifer Recharge. AU - Zlotnik, Vitaly A. , 2013) with dissipation of groundwater mound can be used in lieu of one of the 'simple' methods if the recharge rate used is the infiltration rate measured in the field at the site and the soils are uniform within the extent of the Hantush analysis. surface soil characteristics, subsurface geology, groundwater conditions, and pond geometry. 2005. 528 x 10-4m/s). 2 Can infiltration greater than 0. However, "Modret is a pain in the "A**" and sometimes does not work. 990 . 5 ft below sand layer map was developed to identify the direction of groundwater flow in this area. WU-HT-02-45. 000 6. A geologic cross-section utilizing three monitoring wells and including relevant features such as leaching Figure 3. 3. 24 hrs. the water table. Additionally, it is observed that for storms less than approximately 0. on basic types of molding. Safety Hantush's Groundwater Mounding Equation Solved! Introduction. ___ Background groundwater quality. GroundwaterSoftware. SHWT (7. 6 navfac p-418 c-1 change no. A total of 26 wells, each connected to the pumping system, are to be used. Advection with dispersion and chemical retardation Chemical retardation occurs when a solute (contaminant) reacts with the porous media and its rate of movement is retarded relative the advective groundwater velocity. The vertical gradient calculations are attached as . 035 4. From complex watershed modeling to pre- and post-development drainage studies with detention ponds, we make stormwater modeling a breeze. The groundwater mounding calculator can be used to estimate the rise of groundwater levels underneath infiltration basins. Consulting with contractors, commercial and residential facilities, and government clients to develop cost-effective engineering solutions to wastewater challenges. Precipitation infiltrates through surface soils and moves through this vadose zone to Groundwater flow models are used to calculate the rate and direction of movement of groundwater through aquifers and confining units in the subsurface. 2. TABLES Distributing a fixed recharge target volume over a longer season therefore reduces groundwater mounding. For the calculation, we used a percol ation rate of 10 minutes per inch (per Pace). Pit B to Pit A). Therefore, 420 square which may be employed to evaluate mounding caused by groundwater perching over a fine layer if no permanent water table exists under natural recharge conditions. , at distribution system) –SH = static head (or elevation head) = high point elevation –pump off elevation –FH = friction head or headloss = major + minor losses 9 intended solely to provide applicants with useful tools, example calculations, and Figure 1-1 Groundwater Mounding Beneath a Retention System. 0270, subpart 6. 4. 0m of the soakaway I use "Modret" to iterate the mounding calc's using output from "HydroCAD" hydrographs. Mathematica is extremely powerful and can solve just about any mathematical The influence zone distance was determined using a USGS groundwater mounding calculator with conservative assumptions (a 300 foot long practice with a maximum ponding depth of 4 feet). Construction sites are dewatered for the following purposes: 1- To provide suitable working surface of the bottom of the excavation. To be effective, An R package for calculating groundwater mounding beneath an infiltration basin based on the Hantush equation, 1967. For one of my projects, a few years ago I needed to calculate the groundwater mounding due to a recharge source. In reviewing the U. 000 4. The gradients were generated using the USEPA Vertical Gradient Calculator. 33 (ft/yr) = Dv / O = v = linear Darcy groundwater transport velocity. GROUNDWATER MONITORING The following should be included to address groundwater monitoring: ___ Proposal for a groundwater monitoring program to be incorporated into the groundwater discharge permit. enough so that excessive mounding between the drains did not intercept the surface. groundwater table is to be lowered to the base of the excavation using a pattern of wells along the rectangular perimeter. Groundwater may be just below the surface or deep in the earth. • When an overlying soil layer within groundwater mounding zone has a smaller f-factor (lower K) than underlying layer, use the smallest f-factor (lower K) to calculate Linear Loading Rate • When an overlying soil layer within the groundwater mounding zone has as larger f-factor (higher K) than underlying layer, the Linear Mounding often occurs beneath engineering structures designed to infiltrate reuse water. ___ Groundwater mounding calculations. Great for a spring container on a deck or patio. • The design of a mound system with <24 inches of sand below the distribution media. These same calculations give an estimate of hundreds of feet (Figure 1. Impact factor: Cite as: Installation. His simulations also show that if a water-table mound exists between two lakes, there are very few geologic settings that lead to groundwater movement from one lake to the other. GTA facilitated issuance of a groundwater discharge permit from the MDE for the Town; the system is in operation. g. For details on how to install KWB-R packages checkout our installation tutorial. 2. Such mounding was previously predicted for longer times by a procedure of uncertain accuracy and having a number of limitations. 000 3. They should have a better method. 5b. However, try to avoid arranging everything like a series of steps. " Equation G-1 Qp = (X ft)(RI) Step 12: Use Equation G-2 to calculate how much additional waste water, in gpd/linear foot across the slope, the site can be expected to handle. Mound (CWRS) - Soil Water Mounding. Roma Moulding is a wholesale manufacturer of handmade Italian picture frames made from fine quality real wood materials. There exist different approaches, both by numerical integration and as development of a (double) power series, to implement this function that were elaborated in a number of papers because it is not obvious how to compute the function accurately under all circumstances. 10. All detention basins mound. 2. 1: Example Calculations of Maximum Mounding Height by Facility Configuration from USGS Calculator (Carlton, 2010) . 5) solute velocity where p is the aquifer bulk density. mounded groundwater con plan (8/23/05) proposed locations of infiltration basins limitations test pit logs boring and well logs laboratory conduct tests graphs of flow rate data for hydraulic load test graphs of groundwater mound from data loggers manual data collected during hydraulic load test aqtesolv results mounding calculations calculations presented should not be viewed as an evaluation of regulatory compliance with existing standards. The original way of moving groundwater was from an open well using a bucket and rope. Use the equation ΔH= ([Q x L] / [A x K]) to determine by how much the groundwater will mound. 000 6. The maximum mound is shown as a function of distance from the center of the infiltration practice. 3. Louis, MO, by the International Groundwater Modeling Center, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO. Roldin et al. com - Perform hantush water mounding calculations online. The macro uses the Excel function “Goal seek” to converge on a solution where the estimated and calculated water levels are within 0. 6. Geological Survey river gauge data, the gauge shows Figure 8 indicates that mounding of the groundwater table is being simulated in the vicinity of the new landfill and stormwater ponds. g. • The design of a mound system with >24 inches of sand below the distribution media. Groundwater Mound Beneath Circular Recharge Area [exit DNR] Online calculator for equations for predicting the maximum height of the water table beneath a circular recharge area. Geological Survey’s 2010 report entitled “Simulation of Groundwater Mounding Beneath Hypothetical Stormwater Infiltration Basins” . Despite these large assumptions, the groundwater flow equation does a good job of representing the distribution of heads in aquifers due to a transient distribution of sources and sinks. Pumping from a groundwater well creates a cone of depression around the well, and a resulting roughly parabolic capture zone. Further, we develop a numerical method for modelling • No recharge: mounding due to irrigation not considered. From evaluating the impact of development on existing resources, to developing an alternate water source for your business or an additional source to meet existing demand, to engineering and maintaining stormwater and wastewater infrastructure, our goal is to provide you with the expertise you need to Groundwater Mounding - Regulatory agencies such as the MDE Groundwater Discharge Permitting Program usually require a quantitative prediction of the potential for groundwater mounding associated with the proposed discharge. § PC SubSoil . 0 gallons/day/square foot. Aquifer thickness: (Distance to impermeable boundary below aquifer) - (distance to groundwater when groundwater is at its published in:Analytical Groundwater Modeling: Flow and Contaminant Migration by William C. The mounding analysis shall provide details and supporting documentation on the methods used and assumptions made, including values used in calculations. 6 = 5. To determine the contaminant concentration downgradient of a constant between the induced mounding and the ground surface) f = 10. ) 5. Units in Theis unsteady groundwater flow to a well calculator: cm=centimeter, ft=foot, gal=gallon (U. Maintains Traction While More specifically, one should know the spatial distribution of permeable and less permeable layers below the water table. System size: The maximum application rate for a mound system is 1. The manual focuses on infiltration ponds located in unconsolidated geologic materials. 75 inches increased mounding does not occur at the site. Reference: Concepts and requirements provided in this document were obtained One groundwater-flow model developed by the USGS in the Pennsauken Township area in Camden County was used to delineate contributing areas to the Puchack well field. 4. 79 . PHAST (USGS) - 3D Subsurface Hydraulics, Constituent Transport and Transformations. PC Subsoil is software for the analysis of subsoil drainage in Western Australia and allows the user to calculate groundwater mounding under a range of conditions including: rainfall recharge, subsoil drain spacing, soil above subsoil drain invert hydraulic conductivity, and whether the soil below subsoil drain invert is permeable or impermeable. Duxbury Town Hall 878 Tremont Street Duxbury, MA 02332 (781) 934-1100 We can perform a hand calculation to check our calculatorfor a groundwater mound beneath a rectangular recharge area. Calculation of potential groundwater mounding Provision of a comprehensive report Groundwater quality in the basin generally meets drinking water standards; however, the extent and concentrations of naturally- occurring nitrate and high-nitrate septage in the unsaturated zone are not well understood and require further investigation. Because these equations contain the well function, they cannot be solved explicitly for the several variables employed in terms of the known mound height. 5) (10. Walton, CRC Press, 1988. Figure 6. A method to calculate groundwater mound height in unconfined aquifers due to arbitrarily varying temporal recharge (percolation) is also proposed. 2 ANALYSIS To assess groundwater dilution and its dependence on the hydrogeologic characteristics of the YM setting, a series of two-dimensional (2D) computer simulations of groundwater flow and radionuclide transport used to calculate the existing water quality (area weighted averages of the well medians) are shown in . through . ___ Existing groundwater quality. Water level drops of up to 8 m around the pumping wells and increases up to 10 m at the recharge ponds occur during the annual pumping period, usually January through March [ Watt , 2003 ]. The Darcy&#x27;s Law equation give the relationship among the flow rate of a liquid through a porous medium (such as an The calibrated groundwater flow model described in NewField s (2019) was used in the analysis described below to simulate high groundwater conditions, groundwater mounding and nitrate concentrations from storm water discharge at the Site . 000 1. MOUNDING ANALYSIS A computer model was developed to evaluate groundwater mounding beneath the PSDAs. 1 bar) to ensure uniform distribution and minimal channeling. For the finite aquifer case, the method of images, which is commonly Modelling of groundwater mounding is not required. 000 9. 0 became the first aquifer testing software to feature groundwater mounding calculators that predict the transient rise and decay of the water table beneath rectangular and circular recharge areas (Hantush 1967). Subsequently, the results were matched with numerical methods. mounding by 15% when compared to finite-difference simulations. A groundwater mound forms beneath the recharge ponds, which causes an increase in groundwater discharge to the river at a later time as the mound dissipates. J. This distance and driving directions will also be displayed on google map labeled as Distance Map and Driving Directions Michigan (US). 6. Project No. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2010-5102 "Simulation of groundwater mounding beneath hypothetical stormwater infiltration basins". References include but are not Calculating Pump Requirements •Flowdictated by distribution system or conveyance demands •Total Dynamic Head(TDH) = PH + SH + FH –PH = pressure head at endpoint (e. The Mounding of the ground‐water table beneath recharge sources may be of concern where the raised water table approaches too closely to near‐surface facilities or features. 67 3. 10 (ft) = Ax = longitudinal groundwater dispersivity. A long, narrow slope will minimize the "mounding" of the groundwater table under the absorption bed. 0. Methods for Evaluation of Groundwater Mounding Potential Stormwater infiltration and recharge to the underlying groundwater table will in most cases create a groundwater mound beneath the infiltration facility. A true essential reference, this book provides a unified presentation of groundwater hydrology, treating fundamental principles, methods and Processes we might want to model • Groundwater flow calculate both heads and flow • Solute transport – requires information on flow (velocities) calculate concentrations 24. For 10-acre sites, the maximum heights of the simulated groundwater mound range from 0. In this paper several analytical methods were compared for very rapid, rapid and moderately rapid hydraulic conductivity values. Download for offline reading, highlight, bookmark or take notes while you read Groundwater Engineering: Edition 2. Diagrams of Groundwater Flow to a Pumping Well (Wells Screened in Confined Aquifer) AQTESOLV Groundwater Mounding Solutions AQTESOLV Professional includes solutions by Hantush (1967) to compute the transient water-table rise beneath rectangular or circular recharge areas. , P. g. 5. 1. ] GroundwaterSoftware. 1996) or in confined aquifers at considerable distances WATER TABLE AQUIFER Fig. This is input, we performed calculations based upon known chemical and geologic relationships to generate an estimate of the mass of product and subsurface placement required to affect remediation of the site. 1 Standard Requirements 108 6. 000 3. Calculator inputs and results are summarized in the table above. With this formulation, groundwater mounding can be calculated as follows: Δ h p = R L 2 m K H (5) Groundwater quality analyses were performed to establish background water quality, and numerical groundwater flow modeling was performed to evaluate groundwater mounding potential. 0 in/hr @ 11. 209) 3. Results of 5 calculator runs to determine the maximum mound under an infiltration practice in a medium sand. Mainly you need to do the mounding to figure the time it take to empty you detention area. 000 1. (2013) presented a . Fancier materials, such as wood or plaster, as well as more complex labor can increase the total cost to $8-12+ per ln. Michigan (US) Driving Distance Calculator, calculates the Distance and Driving Directions between two addresses, places, cities, villages, towns or airports in Michigan (US). based on the Hantush equation (Hantush, 1967) underestimate the maximum height of groundwater . • Only consider uniform flow in the longitudinal direction – Flow field should not deviate too much from this assumption or results may be inaccurate. A spreadsheet was developed to solve the Hantush analytical equation, which can be used to calculate groundwater mounding. 2: North Orange County Groundwater Basin Protection Boundary and Plume In this study, the well-known Hantush solution procedure for groundwater mounding under infinitely long infiltration strips is extended to finite and semi-infinite aquifer cases. 703 1. 75 (barium) Considering the influence of groundwater mound, the Green-Ampt model and an approximate analytical solution is developed in this investigation. The site is designed to be a quick-reference or resource guide for selecting appropriate methods for estimating recharge in humid areas. 83. The approximation must be related to the requirements in part 7081. iv. com - Perform hantush water mounding calculations online. Appendix D. The mounding calcs state that “the maximum height is only reference and does not need to be Hantush (1967) provided time‐dependent equations for describing ground‐water mounds resulting from axisymmetric recharge. ) of Santa Fe, NM. ” A deci- ty layers in the vadose zone and, sequences associated with exces- sion-support tool extends the ultimately, the rise of the water sive mounding become more se- method, following the philosophy Small Flows Quarterly, Winter 2005, Volume 6, Number 1 FIGURE 2 Flowchart for preliminary assessment of the potential for groundwater mounding Calculations included demonstrating groundwater mounding will not impact system performance when the width of the system exceeds 15 feet 382. OpenOffice (Sun Microsystems) - Database, Spreadsheet, Graphics, Presentation, Word Processor. Treatment is further enhanced by using a pressure distribution system to uniformly apply ("dose") the septic tank effluent over the mound bed several times per day. A recharging lake can leak through part or all of its bed. Groundwater Mounding Associated with Cluster and High-Density Wastewater Soil Absorption Systems. It is useful in connection with extraction of groundwater from an aquifer through wells for water supply, irrigation, and industrial use and for investigation and remediation of groundwater contamination. 00 Calculator B2 + user’s guide V 1. In addition, Skelly and Loy uses this modeling approach to evaluate available disposal scenarios for ensuring that permits are acquired using the most cost-effective option(s). The volume of water, expressed as a percentage of the total […] Groundwater mounding has been observed experimentally as a temporary and short-lived phenomenon (Nimmer et al. The depth to water and several geochemical parameters were monitored at various adjacent wells during the injection event to measure influence of the injection and any groundwater mounding effects. 32). The potential for mounding increases when the materials have low hydraulic conductivity, the water The groundwater mounding calculator can be used to estimate the rise of groundwater levels underneath infiltration basins. 1. It provides a conservative estimate of drainage time The period between the maximum water level and the minimum level (dry weather or antecedent level). A groundwater mound will form above such ahorizontal barrier. 0. The mounding calculations identified that the stormwater infiltration system must be raised by two feet. Groundwater Mounding Calculation - Online (Hantush, 1967) Groundwater Mounding Rectangular Area- Online (Hantush, 1967) Radius of Influence - Calculator (Hantush, 1967) Great Books on Low Impact Development. For instance, a clay lens impedes the downward flow of excess irrigation water or, if the area is not irrigated, the downward flow of excess rainfall. Ada County Highway District We know water resource challenges arise in a number of large and small ways on your projects. Net effect to baseflow for each calendar year was calculated by totaling the imported water credit (mound accretions) and the streamflow depletion at the southern shallow groundwater systems to a large rainfall event. extent of groundwater mounding increases when soil perme-ability, aquifer thickness, design-storm magnitude, or percent-age of impervious cover are increased (and values of other variables are held constant). HortScienc. 458,000 cubic Km 74,200 cubic Km 502,800 cubic Km 44,800 cubic Km Incorrect Question 2 0 / 1 pts 2. 26 to 3. A spreadsheet was developed to solve the Hantush analytical equation, which can be used to calculate groundwater Mounding Analysis Calculate Mounding Height: Hantush 1967 Analytical Solution Mounding Height (z max) Function of: Loading Rate (q’) Initial saturated thickness (h i) of aquifer Horizontal hydraulic conductivity (K h) Discharge area (l, w) Time since infiltration began (t) Specific yield (S y) Literature sourced value Adverse hydraulic impact to groundwater and adjustment of drain time scenario A Comparison of Mounding Effects Caused by Different Recharge Rates 15 0. 000 2. As the intent is only to assess potential risk, a groundwater model representing mounding will suffice. The remedial design process is commonly visualized as a linear sequence (see Section 5. 80 Tier 2 Soil-to-Groundwater PCL Equation L L K (Groundwater PCL ) LDF Soil = 1 2 sw * GW ⋅ ⋅ *Critical groundwater PCL as determined in accordance with §350. Once recharge ceased, the mounds gradually disappeared over a two-month period. 000 2. θ ρ ′θ ρ ws d b as 2 b sw + K + H = (mg / kg - soil) (mg / L - H O) K I W U LDF [dimensionless] = 1 + f s gw δgw δ α U b-I W Figure VIII. 0 V 2. GWM (WIN) Version 1. 000 7. 00 0. The shape and height of the mound depend on many factors including the geometry of the local recharge, the rate of supply of leachate, the geologic Pump and treat systems can be installed for the purpose of controlling contaminated groundwater mounding and migration, or for reducing the contaminant flux rate from a source area. The attached design summary tables specify the assumptions used in preparation of this technical design. This study illustrates the utility of groundwater monitoring for the purpose of Two groundwater mounds were detected downgradient of sinkholes. AQTES OL V­ ­ Th e W or ld' s Most Adv an ce d S oftw ar e for Aqu ife r Te st An aly sis 3. The maximum areal extent of groundwater mounding of 0. mounding on Dogwood Borer infestation. infiltration from large basins on local groundwater mounding showing that analytical solutions . An electrical component mounted in this manner is referred to as a surface-mount device (SMD). 23 across the three Feature shorter shrubs, mounding perennials and ankle-high ground-cover plants in front. However, "Modret is a pain in the "A**" and sometimes does not work. I use "Modret" to iterate the mounding calc's using output from "HydroCAD" hydrographs. 4 Statistical Analysis 2. 27. C. 5 (From Table 1) LLR = (1. P8 (W W Walker) - Hydrology, Hydraulics, Water Quality. 000 10. 3 Step 9, and Section D-2. 2) that begins with the CSM; however, in practice, the overall in situ design process is iterative and cyclical with many feedback loops at any step connecting to both earlier and later steps (see Figure 3-1). Helpful note . This proportionality constant is the distribution coefficient, k`,, and from it one can calculate the rate of movement of solute in a flowing groundwater system relative to the rate of flow of the transporting water itself according to the expression water velocity = (1 + P kit), (8. The Objectives of the Present Study Are as Follows: Studying groundwater recharge using multiple recharge wells at different arrangement, i. 0 in/hr @ 23. 0 ft 2. 3. Provide narrative discussion of study/data source applicability. Divergent radial flows developed from both of these mounds. 1 Subsurface Disposal 111 Gardening plant: "Six-inch high, mounding plant with aromatic, fern-like leaves. This also includes the treatment of soil and sediment should it be contaminated as a result of coming into contact with contaminated groundwater. An unsaturated zone of permeable materials exists above this groundwater “table” (the vadose zone). AU - Kacimov, Anvar. KT3D_H2O is a freeware application and following is available for download: KT3D_H20_Setup, a self-executable installation file that will install all necessary Dynamic Link Library files (dll’s), user’s manuals into appropriate MapWindow folders. One mound indicated an increase of 4. Filed under Aquifer test solution Match curve Slug test Aquifer Test Solution Slug These calculations were completed using historical TBNRD pumping data, groundwater mound, and recharge data as inputs to the RRCA groundwater model. This method is still applied in many places, though it is limited in terms of the volume of water that can be moved as well as the depth from which it can be fetched. WU-HT-02-45. Groundwater monitoring refers to the monitoring of local groundwater resources to evaluate changes in chemical, biological and physical characteristics. iii Localized ground‐water mounding beneath larger on‐site sewage disposal fields (septic drain fields) can reduce and even eliminate the waste‐water treatment that occurs in the unsaturated soil zone. 2 Plan vicws of 111-channel infiltration systems with 10% Groundwater Mounding Associated with Cluster and High-Density Wastewater Soil Absorption Systems. In general, groundwater flow has been from the north to the south parallel to the James River. S. 2. 5 per ln. groundwater aquifers. . 62 hrs; ̶̶̶ R = 1. 29. S. 5 Ambient Groundwater Quality 105 6. 5 ft below sand layer Groundwater Mounding - Causes, Issues and Prevention •HLR = water dumped daily onto the same piece of land, every day, for a long time ‒Values in SPM based on soil infiltration characteristics, need to consider underlying materials ‒Too much will saturate soil, reduce or eliminate unsat flow, may cause GW mounding Key Relevant Information The median of the maximum-height distribution from 432 simulations is 1. 2. This includes an analysis of the reduction in permeability rate when groundwater mounding is present. HortScience 40(7):2066-2070 and was awarded the top extension paper in the American Society for Horticulture Science that year. Perry. Therefore, the location of surficial sand bodies can be used in conjunction with water-table data to make informed groundwater resource management decisions. Additionally, rising groundwater mounds can cause the The end of year brings a change of seasons and products. More information can be found in the U. Monitoring calculations describing potential mounding below the discharge. 3. 3. Prepared for the National Decentralized Water Resources Capacity Development Project, Washington University, St. Across the US, homeowners report spending about $5-6. All tools are incorporated into a decision support environment. describing groundwater flow as they apply to the local mounding of the groundwater that occurs under an isolated recharge system. Groundwater typically lies from 10 to 40 feet below the ground surface within these permeable materials (Figure 1. Groundwater mounding was identified in MW-SA-4 and MW-SA-5 during the May and July sampling events. [Note: If the link does not work at first, keep trying later. The water balance method and 2D numerical simulation of variable saturation zone were used to calculate rainfall infiltration recharge coefficient, water supply, and evaporative discharge of rain garden. Other projects. However, for sites with very deep water tables (>100 feet) where groundwater mounding to the base of the BMP is not likely to occur, it is recommended that you limit the total depth of the soil column in . 78. , dispersivity and decay rate) are assumed constant in the current model Tulare Lake Hydrologic Region California’s Groundwater San Joaquin Valley Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118 According to these calculations, the total storage capacity of this subbasin is estimated to be 15,400,000 af to a depth of 300 feet and 107,000,000 af to the base of fresh groundwater. Fig. From Sichardt’s equation, the resulting radius of influence would be: AQTESOLV Groundwater Mounding Solutions AQTESOLV Professional includes solutions by Hantush (1967) to compute the transient water-table rise beneath rectangular or circular recharge areas. 0001 [4,25]. PCRaster (Utrecht Univ) - Raster GIS. an approximation of the rise in groundwater from system operation as determined by groundwater mounding calculations. 00 (ft) = Ay = transverse groundwater dispersivity. Calculate the difference between the volume of water evaporating from and precipitating onto the oceans. Providing a useful example, Hantush (1967) developed a model for groundwater mounding beneath a rectangular recharge area, where, This model is discussed in a bit more the U. ithin 24 hours afterW the falling head period, excavate the bottom of the pit (Minimum excavation depths are provided in the City of Seattle Stormwater Manual, Appendix D, Section D-3. These calculations are referred to as simulations. Minor m odifications were made to the flow model, including increasing Hydro-Terra Group’s personnel bring decades of experience to wastewater systems construction projects. Hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer and daily recharge rate were varied to correspond with the soil and aquifer materials shown in the table. Further information on the Mounding Analysis may be found in the Department’s “ Technical Manual for NJPDES Discharge to Ground Water Permits (pdf) . A mounding evergreen shrub displaying light rosey-pink flowers fading to white. Where the groundwater table is relatively shallow, the use of underdrains allows control of groundwater mounding and recovery of the renovated water. 000 8. J. Groundwater Engineering: Edition 2 - Ebook written by Yiqun Tang, Jie Zhou, Ping Yang, Jingjing Yan, Nianqing Zhou. Hantush mounding calculations with contouring now available in AQTESOLV. Read this book using Google Play Books app on your PC, android, iOS devices. No design is available to gauge the impact of this mound and what a redesigned drainage system will consist of. 00 (ft) = Az = vertical groundwater dispersivity. This should be considered where there is a risk of mounding from raising the groundwater levels to within 1. The c) groundwater contours and elevations based on monitoring well data. For this benchmark, we will assume the values in Table 1to compute the maximum height of the mound: Table 2shows the results of the successive approximation calculations for the benchmark problem. This recovered water can be for irrigating crops or for industrial uses. ” Groundwater mounding calculations shall also be provided for all non-stormwater UIC wells with maximum daily proposed discharge rates of 2,000 gallons per day or greater. This site describes the application, data needs, strengths, and weaknesses of widely-used methods for estimating groundwater recharge that have general applicability in humid regions of the U. TY - JOUR. 1 m in water levels, while at the other the increase was 6. The hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer is 100ft/day (3. 2 System Specific Design Parameters 111 6. 6 gpd/ft 4. The site’s proximity to the Cedar River suggested that the water table might be relatively shallow. row arrangement, at vertices of an equilateral triangle and at the vertices of square A Program to Calculate Ground‐Water Mound Heights Because of its high accuracy and wide range of applicability, the method of Hantush is probably the most widely used to calculate the time‐varying heights of ground‐water mounds on extensive and near‐horizontal saturated zones. Allows for Reduced Salt and Sand Usage Due to Low/No Black Ice Development 7. 183 1. 1 General As documented in the Groundwater Monitoring System Demonstration (40 CFR 257. ), many people will answer “zero. The lateral extent of the perched mound from the drainfield perimeter (L d) maybe calculated as: Equation 8 L d = J/aL cK 2 – Lc/2 Equation 9 ADVERTISEMENTS: While porosity is a measure of the water-bearing capacity of the formation, all this water cannot be drained by gravity or by pumping from wells, as a portion of the water is held in the void spaces by molecular and surface tension forces. 1 Groundwater, Mounding Analysis, and PIT Test Results Given our plan to fully infiltrate all project site runoff, depth to groundwater needed to be determined. diameter, aquifer hydraulic conductivity and mound rise above original groundwater level will be changed many times. 000 9. 75 gpd/lf = 27 lf. Learn More. 62 hrs; ̶̶̶ R = 1. Dataset from 2006-2013 about the two main canals in Jiefangzha sub-district (a sub-district with shallow aquifers in Inner Mongolia, China) were selected to calculate the canal seepage losses. They should have a better method. Hydrology Studio software is simple to use and free to download and try. 000 2. e. This mounding ranges from 1. ), hr=hour, km=kilometer, m=meter, min=minute, s=second. SHWT (7. 10: Simulated groundwater mound height against T values Various methods for predicting recharge mounds that form beneath basins during recharge and the subsequent decay after recharge stops have been developed over the past half a century. In areas with deeper groundwater, wells are used to recover the renovated water. • Other parameters (e. PMWiN (Wen-Hsing Chiang) - 3D Groundwater can be controlled by means of one or more types of dewatering systems appropriate to the size and depth of the excavation, geological conditions, and characteristics of the soil. The extent of groundwater mounding is observed to be related to the infiltration rate and the groundwater temperature. 6 3. the mounding calculations. included as Figures 2 through 9. To determine the contaminant concentration downgradient of a constant source, an analytical tool solving the advection-dispersion equation can be utilized. A spreadsheet was developed to solve the Hantush analytical equation, which can be used to calculate groundwater Assume maximum mound Application Rate = 1 gpd/ft2 1. 0 in/hr @ 11. AQTESOLV Home For example, for a 20-acre site with 20 percent impervious surface, the stormwater infiltration basin design capacity (and associated groundwater mound) would be the same as for a 10-acre site with 40 percent impervious surface. These calculations were completed using historical Tri-Basin NRD pumping data, groundwater mound, and recharge data as inputs to the RRCA groundwater model. Background. Table 5-2. 15-2 Groundwater Mounding 36 Figure 4. 000 1. An easy-to-use wizard interface lets you to create grid files for contouring with external software packages. 0 ×5. e. A procedure involving analytical approximation is outlined for using this solution for unconfined aquifers. The Professional Engineer conducting the analysis shall provide the municipal engineer with the methodology and supporting documentation for the mounding analysis used and shall certify to City of To calculate this value analytically, Haitjema and Mitchell‐Bruker [ 2005] use the Dupuit‐Forchheimer approximation, which assumes no resistance to vertical flow. 200. Prepared for the National Decentralized Water Resources Capacity Development Project, Washington University, St. 5 feet (ft). S. 4. and are summarized below . Former Refined Oil and Specialty Chemical Bulk Distribution Facility Darcy&#x27;s Law is a primary tool for groundwater flow modeling. Risk assessment When asked how much risk a person is willing to accept for any adverse outcome (illness, injury, loss, death, etc. Recharges Groundwater to Underlying Aquifers 4. A study was conducted to derive new groundwater mounding equations that are simple in their structures but produce reasonable values for conditions most commonly found in stormwater infiltration facilities. ) 2. The final report on the research was published in 2005 in HortScience (Gut, L. Depth-to-Water Table Map A depth-to-water table map shows the spatial distribution of the depth of the water table below the land surface. GZA's original mounding calculations prov;ded in our March 2006 Hydrogeologic Report indicated that the seasonal high water table al Area I varied from elevation 46 feet on the Groundwater mounding is caused by local recharge (usually from a land fill or a waste site) to the saturated zone in an unconfined aquifer. Completion of PGIA reports and groundwater mounding analysis for residential subdivisions on behalf of a water utility. Groundwater data: Text-based search . 78 . (2) The minimum vertical separation distance between the base of the Class V UIC well and bedrock shall be five (5) feet. 36 (dimensionless) = O = soil porosity. 3. 3. This empirical methodology continues under the The most critical site factors effecting head differentials (and therefore, groundwater mounding) are the various hydraulic conductivityvalues ("K") ofthe soils underlying the drainfield area, the depth ofthe unsaturated soils (vadose zone), and the depth of saturated soils (aquifer). The differences in these two designs are noted at various locations throughout this document, including the two separate design examples provided in Appendix B-1 added to the calculations to identify how far downslope the imported treatment sand must be installed. 000 8. 3 Design Parameters 108 6. 000 7. Calculate thickness of available soil for water table rise h = 18 –6 = 12” = 1. H. 000 6. 000 4. ambient seasonal high groundwater table. 4243 Our high elevation plants are exceptionally hardy and have been garden-tested in the high elevation (7,000 ft. 66. The UIC program protects USDWs from endangerment endangermentThe construction, operation, maintenance, conversion, plugging, or abandonment of an injection well, or the performance of other injection activities, by an owner or operator in a manner that allows the movement of fluid containing any contaminant into a USDW, if the presence of that contaminant -N/day/ha, which compares favourably to nitrate load reductions achieved by treatment wetlands. Groundwater Mounding Upon its release in 2006, AQTESOLV/Pro v4. Determine LLR factor (f) from table f = 5. 365(3)(d) Calculations included showing the subsurface drainage system will drain down within 72 hours after a storm event and surface ponding will drain down within 24 hours after 3a storm event The model will need to use the basic equations (from Groundwater risk assessments for infiltration systems calculations and examples (PDF, 304KB, 7 pages)) for determining the impact of a Use the searches below to find monitoring results from the MPCA's ambient groundwater monitoring and landfill monitoring programs. Perfect for a smaller landscape or foundation planting. In the Murray Basin in southeastern Australia, saline waste irrigation waters are often discharged to natural depressions and saline lakes as a salinity and land management strategy. McGhee and R. Once potential groundwater mounding areas have been identified, predicted heave or collapse can be determined You cannot print results, save files and use the groundwater mounding feature. , 2009; Machusick et al. Hantush solved the linearized form of the saturated, radial, groundwater flow equation subject to infiltration from a rectangular or circular area. Figure 4 shows that groundwater flows in a southeasterly direction across the study area. 2. 000 5. Geologists' and drillers' logs for all monitoring wells. The primary groundwater discharge point is the Duwamish Waterway. AU - Al-Maktoumi, Ali For example, for a 20-acre site with 20 percent impervious surface, the stormwater infiltration basin design capacity (and associated groundwater mound) would be the same as for a 10-acre site with 40 percent impervious surface. S. (ft/yr) = Dv = K*i = Darcy groundwater velocity. 000 5. The altered groundwater level, based on mounding calculations, must be considered in determining the vertical separation distance from the infiltration surface to the highest anticipated groundwater elevation as specified in NR 151. 000 10. Calculate the stable mound dimensions. Equation 4D-3 to approximately 20 times the depth of BMP. Summarize findings of studies; provide reference to studies, calculations, maps, data sources, etc. Horizontal separation between distribution Crown Molding Prices. 543. 7m. An easy-to-use wizard interface lets you to create grid files for contouring with external software packages. 1). On January 18, 2018, exploration pits were dug by Associated Earth Check for high groundwater / immediate groundwater mounding: 1. 0 • Drinking water protection maps/groundwater atlases – Class V regulation – Groundwater mounding analysis The equations used to make these calculations are presented in the Excel spreadment that is part of the student assignment. Suitable for Cold-Climate Applications, Maintains Recharge Capacity When Frozen 6. Soil Mounding as a Control for Dogwood Borer in Apple. Groundwater mounding and water composition below the recharge pond suggest that recharge and subsequent lateral transport occur heterogeneously in the underlying aquifer. The dynamic observation data on groundwater level and water quality were obtained from rain gardens #2 and #3 from May to October 2016. Mainly you need to do the mounding to figure the time it take to empty you detention area. the groundwater is flowing slowly (Reynolds number less than unity), and the hydraulic conductivity ( K ) is an isotropic scalar . Any changes in groundwater (such as groundwater mounding) will generally occur over a longer period of time, and often have little effect on the typical peak-flow analysis. 6 Groundwater Mounding Analysis (GMA) 106 6. 1 to 18. On-line calculators for radius of influence, specific capacity and groundwater mounding. , 2011;Price et al. 5 inches per hour be allowed without increasing risk of geotechnical hazards (slope stability, groundwater mounding, utilities, or other factors) regional groundwater flow direction and thus identify the groundwater source areas for these surface-water bodies. The areal extent of groundwater mounding increases when soil permeability, aquifer thickness, design-storm magnitude, or percentage of impervious cover are increased (and values of other variables are held constant). 040! 6. 5) LLR = 15. Mounding of groundwater s that indicate the bedrock valley extending to the southern end of the UWL channels groundwater flowing along the soil-bedrock interface and routes it vertically to the uppermost aquifer. 24 hrs. " Call the result of the calculation, "Qp. groundwater mounding, which is a phenomenon that has been well-studied in arid environ-mental situations. 3-1 Georgia Climatic Divisions 50 The injection was performed under low pressure (generally less than 2. 0 in/hr @ 23. Because of its high accuracy and wide range of applicability, the method of Hantush is probably the most widely used to calculate the time‐varying heights of ground Groundwater Mounding Groundwater mounding can occur when stormwater infiltration rates exceed the soil’s capacity to carry water down to the water table and laterally away from the site via unconfined flow. 762 2. Project No. 4(a)2. These plants are perfect thrive in a harsh, high desert climate with intense sun, hot, dry summers, cold winters, and poor soils, such as the Rockies and Sierra Nevada mountain range. A. The spreadsheet calculates the height of a groundwater mound beneath a hypothetical stormwater infiltration basin. 75 gpd/lf System length is design flow divided by LLR System Length = 420 gpd / 15. 91(f))2, the two existing Step 11: Using Equation G-1, calculate the number of gallons per day falling on a one-foot-wide strip from hole "U" to hole "D. As part of National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCRHP) project 25-51, Geosyntec conducted variably saturated vadose zone/groundwater modeling of four case study sites and more than 3,000 idealized scenarios to evaluate the effect of infiltration BMPs on groundwater mounding and soil moisture. However, as development moves into areas with less permeable soils or where groundwater is close to, or at, existing natural surface and fill costs become significant, more accurate determination of the groundwater mounding becomes critical. iii groundwater (elevation 166. The required calculations frequently are sensitive to variations in horizontal hydraulic conductivity, often requiring SEEP/W and SEEP3D can model almost any groundwater problem including: Hydraulic response of a dam or levee to water level fluctuations; Changes in pore-water pressure conditions within earth slopes due to infiltration; Mounding of the groundwater table beneath water retention structures such as lagoons and tailings ponds Page 5 of the chapter addresses groundwater mounding: As with any infiltration BMP, groundwater mounding impacts must be assessed, as required by N. As discussed in previous sections, the We know water resource challenges arise in a number of large and small ways on your projects. Download the Darcy drainage time calculator tool dry climates with deep groundwater levels (Tyler et al. 0, 2015/11/29 GW_Chart: a program for creating specialized graphs used in groundwater studies. Any groundwater effects must be included in the constant flow or velocity that you use with HydroCAD. Pump Test Data Analysis and Preliminary Groundwater Impact Assessment, Residential Properties. The height and shape of the mound depends on the infiltration system design, the recharge rate, and the hydrogeologic AWM conducted groundwater mounding calculations and determined that it would be feasible to discharge 67,500 gpd of treated wastewater at this site without the subsequent groundwater mound rising within four feet of the ground surface. tm 5-818-5 afm 88-5, chap. The simulation of groundwater flow requires a thorough understanding of the hydrogeological characteristics of a site. Initially, the solution for infinite aquifers is presented and compared to those available in literature and to the numerical results of MODFLOW. 000 4. AQTESOLV software and a spreadsheet solution for Hantush, together with soil moisture water balance (SWAGMAN farm model), were used for quantitatively predicting the height and extent of groundwater mounding underground to assess the groundwater-flow simulations of infiltration from a hypothetical Groundwater Mounding Analyses Changes: NJDEP guidance documents related to potential impacts from on-site SWM infiltration systems initially proposed groundwater mounding analyses using an empirical evaluation with methods suggested by a cooperative effort with the United States Geological Survey. The groundwater mounding analysis shall calculate the maximum height of the groundwater mound based upon the volume of the maximum design storm. Calculate Linear Loading Rate (from Darcy’s Law) LLR = h ×f =1. On occasion sweep low plantings towards the back, and taller ones to the front, to create depth and interest. Refinement of Groundwater Mounding Risk – simulate the current reported approach to groundwater mound interception, developing revised snapshots of mound distributions and revisions to the Project water balance as a result of reversing the mine direction (i. Net effect to baseflow for each calendar year was calculated by totaling the imported water credit (mound accretions) and the streamflow depletion at the southern boundary of the TBNRD. A narrative evaluation of the accuracy of the approximation must be provided. Stormwater Management for Low Impact Development. An AEM model was developed to calculate groundwater mounding beneath the wastewater disposal basins, and to outline the zones of treated water flowing away from the basins. Protecting drinking water resources. 00 20. 0 ft. the calculation of groundwater mounding for this Project, using the 562-foot × 566-foot leachfield size. Both time­ dependent and time-independent solutions are considered. This was separated from the “toe of slope” requirements that typically relate to the soils, percent of slope, and height of the mound. A groundwater mound will form above such a horizontal barrier (Figure 4). Results obtained Groundwater depths at the Site generally range from 3 to 10 feet bgs. Please remember that Woehler Landscape Supply offers ice melting products and cordwood delivery year round as well as all of our other full line of products. 7:8-5. 000 0 204060 80 100 120 140---- R = 2. 2. 000 3. 7 Supplemental HSR Considerations 107 6. Mission, KS, to provide a rough estimate of groundwater mounding and compare the potential risks for impacts to surrounding structures. 1 headquarters departments of the army, air force, and navy w ashington, dc 27 june 1985 dewatering and groundwater control Implementing Hantush’s well function¶. 2-1 General Monitoring Well - Cross Section 43 Figure 5. Blooms all summer with yellow/gold, half-inch daisy flowers" Continuing in its forty-year history of providing students and professionals with a thorough grounding in the science and technology of groundwater hydrology, this third edition has been completely updated to reflect the tremendous changes in the field. All detention basins mound. The only area with no assimilative capacity is the Mound basin where the existing TDS groundwater quality exceeds the water quality objectives. Where the mounding analysis identifies adverse impacts, the infiltration basin shall be redesigned or relocated, as appropriate. 308 0. Groundwater mounding occurs in the vicinity of the tank farms located in the central portion of Harbor Island; and due to this, infiltration of precipitation is the primary recharge mechanism (PEG 1994). We also have Online sales of a wide range of groundwater sampling equipment including YSI 556, and Solinst Levelogger including software such as MODFLOW, RBCA Tool Kit, Hydrus, Surfer 9, and Groundwater Vistas. An additional, approximate approach is presented. Is standing water or seepage visible in the excavation hole? (Yes GES further evaluated the occurrence of groundwater mounding by computing vertical groundwater gradients among all new well clusters 20, 2015 gauging data)(using August. 2. However, after 80 years, the difference in the maximum groundwater table rise is only about 5% between the different recharge timing scenarios. ft. For 10-acre sites, the maximum heights of the simulated groundwater mound range from 0. 000 20 40 60 80 100 120 Mounding Estimation by Analytical Methods Hantush Solution One of the best known analytical solutions for predicting groundwater mound development was presented by Hantush (1967). We also have Online sales of a wide range of groundwater sampling equipment including YSI 556, and Solinst Levelogger including software such as MODFLOW, RBCA Tool Kit, Hydrus, Surfer 9, and Groundwater Vistas. 17. 5 feet (ft). The DWMS should identify if groundwater management may be necessary based on a review of available regional bore data available from the Department of Water’s Water Information Network and consider key defining factors including key receiving 6. Louis, MO, by the International Groundwater Modeling Center, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO. 000 5. An analysis of groundwater mounding potential is required as per Table 1. Groundwater mounding is known to cause changes in the surrounding ecosystem such as changes to the vegetative balance and available water supply, among other areas of concern. It is hoped that the proposed methods would be of help to field engineers and practitioners. Where the groundwater levels are to be close to the base of the soakaway, the water infiltrating into the underlying soils can lead to a mounding effect which locally raises the groundwater levels beneath the soakaway. KEY WORDS 18. 4 Surface Water Assessment Report (SWAR) 108 6. 23 Depression-focused groundwater recharge in hummocky terrain (after Meybloom, 1966b). The plants featured here are perfectly suited for high elevation gardening conditions. Enable javascript in your browser's settings to view menus and other features on this site. 000 0. In addition, this analysis may be used to determine the effects of groundwater lowering or mounding on surface water bodies (e. This paper presents the new simplified equations and their theoretical development. The contributing areas to this major well field, shown in figure 3, was determined by using particle-tracking analysis that calculates the travel times of water to wells (Pope and Area of landfill (groundwater mound area) = 525,000 ft2 Length of discharge boundary to wetlands = 1100 ft Concentrations (mg/1) of metals at discharge boundary = 83. 3. 2, purportedly 2015-09-11 groundwater mounding is present. First, we must check the two conditions for equation application: 1) Check Channel Length-Width Ratio = 60/6 =10 ok; the equations should be all right as long as this ratio is larger than 5 Adverse hydraulic impact to groundwater and adjustment of drain time scenario A Comparison of Mounding Effects Caused by Different Recharge Rates 15 0. 000 7. From evaluating the impact of development on existing resources, to developing an alternate water source for your business or an additional source to meet existing demand, to engineering and maintaining stormwater and wastewater infrastructure, our goal is to provide you with the expertise you need to maximum groundwater mounding (beneath center of basin at end of infiltration period) Re-Calculate Now Groundwater Mounding, in feet 140 Mounding, in in x direction, in feet 7. 2). This mound is likely due to surface Figure 3: Time evolution of groundwater mound with underlying flow around a 90-degree bend Figure 4: Time evolution of groundwater mound with underlying planar flow In this work, we developed test problems in groundwater mounding for the purpose of assessing computational software. Table 5-4. At the Noora disposal basin in South Australia the waste irrigation water ( EC = 17-19 dS m<SUP>-1</SUP>) has formed a lens in the top of the highly saline (50-80 dS m <SUP>-1</SUP>) regional groundwater (Parilla The mounding calculations indicate that the groundwater mound experienced while the system recharges stormwater will extend about 8 feet above the existing phone 508. 9: Simulated groundwater mound for 8 scenarios of water volumes a,b,c: scenarios A1, A2, A3 81 Fig. groundwater mounding calculator